Retirement Planning Under the Old & New Tax Regime

Discover how your choice between the Old and New Tax Regimes can shape your retirement corpus. Learn which regime maximises long-term, post-tax wealth growth. Compare NPS, EPF, PPF, and annuities to build a tax-efficient future.

How your choice of tax regime can redefine your journey to financial freedom

Every rupee you earn, invest, or withdraw interacts with the tax system in ways that can either build up or quietly erode your long-term wealth. Over the past few years, this equation has become even more complex and interesting. Why? The coexistence of the Old Tax Regime and the New Tax Regime.

The government's introduction of the new regime was aimed at simplicity: lower tax rates and fewer deductions, giving taxpayers more flexibility and fewer calculations. But when it comes to retirement where incentives like Section 80C, NPS deductions, and EPF contributions can create massive long-term advantages, the choice between the two regimes can make a difference worth lakhs of rupees over time. The New Regime is obviously simpler, but it also means you must be intentional about saving, since the tax system no longer “rewards” your long-term discipline in the same way.

At its heart, this decision isn't about today's tax saving; it's about designing a retirement plan that maximises your after-tax lifetime income. Let's unpack what each regime means, how it affects your retirement products like NPS, EPF, PPF, and annuities, and which type of investor might benefit more from each.

Understanding the Old vs New Tax Regime

Before we compare their impact on retirement, it's important to understand the fundamental difference between the two systems.

The Old Tax Regime is the traditional structure that allows a range of deductions and exemptions for everything from 80C and 80D to HRA and home loan interest. It rewards disciplined, long-term saving behaviour by reducing taxable income if you invest in eligible instruments.

In contrast, the New Tax Regime (Section 115BAC) offers lower slab rates but removes most of these deductions and exemptions. It's designed for taxpayers who prefer straightforward tax computation without the need to plan around exemptions. The government has gradually refined it, making it the default regime from FY 2023-24 onwards - but both systems continue to coexist, giving taxpayers a choice.

Key differences include:

  • The Old Regime offers higher tax rates but extensive deductions (under Sections 80C, 80D, 80CCD, and more), effectively nudging you toward saving for the future
  • The New Regime provides lower rates with limited deductions, except for employer NPS contributions and standard deduction
  • Under the New Regime, however, most personal deductions are gone except for employer contributions to NPS (under Section 80CCD(2)) and the standard deduction on salary and pension income
  • The New Regime is now the default system, but taxpayers can still opt for the Old Regime if it's financially beneficial

Tax Implications for Key Retirement Instruments

Let's break down how both regimes treat India's most common retirement products. Assumptions are based on current income tax laws as of FY 2025-26.

  1. National Pension System (NPS)

    The NPS is one of India's most tax-efficient retirement vehicles but the benefits vary significantly across regimes.

    Under the Old Regime, investors can claim:

    • ₹1.5 lakh under Section 80C for their contribution
    • An additional ₹50,000 under Section 80CCD(1B) for NPS investments
    • Employer contribution deductions under Section 80CCD(2), up to 10% of salary (14% for central government employees)

    At exit, 60% of the NPS corpus is tax-free, while 40% must be used to buy an annuity, whose payouts are taxed as income.

    Under the New Regime, personal deductions under 80C and 80CCD(1B) are unavailable, but employer contributions under 80CCD(2) (upto 14% of salary) continue to enjoy full tax exemption within limits. So, for salaried individuals whose employers contribute meaningfully to NPS, it remains one of the few remaining tax-friendly tools even under the new system.

  2. Employee Provident Fund (EPF) and Voluntary Provident Fund (VPF)

    For most salaried employees, EPF is the backbone of retirement savings.

    • Under the Old Regime, contributions to EPF and VPF qualify for deduction under 80C( up to Rs. 1.5 lakh annually) and the interest and maturity proceeds remain tax-free within limits.
    • Under the New Regime, EPF still functions as a powerful compounding instrument, but its contribution no longer reduces your taxable income. The tax-free nature of maturity benefits, however, remains unchanged which means EPF is still a must-have, even if the short-term tax benefits vanish.
  3. Public Provident Fund (PPF)

    PPF continues to be one of the safest long-term investment tools, ideal for individuals without employer retirement benefits.

    • Under the Old Regime, contributions up to ₹1.5 lakh a year qualify under Section 80C, and the interest and maturity are tax-free.
    • Under the New Regime, Like the EPF, PPF contributions no longer qualify for tax deductions. However, the interest earned and the maturity proceeds remain fully tax-free under the Exempt-Exempt-Exempt (EEE) framework.

    In essence, under the new regime, PPF transforms from a tax-saving instrument to a pure long-term wealth stabiliser.

  4. Annuities and Pension Plans

    Annuities provide guaranteed post-retirement income, but their taxation can influence how much you actually receive monthly.

    • Under both regimes, annuity payouts are taxable as income under the “salaries/pension” head
    • The Old Regime offers relief through deductions and lower taxable income, whereas the New Regime's lower slab rates may offset this partially
    • The most tax-efficient structure often combines a partial annuity with systematic withdrawals from NPS or mutual funds to manage overall tax liability

A Realistic Example: Which Regime Saves More?

Let's take a simple, real-world case. Your annual salary is ₹18 lakh. You invest ₹1.5 lakh under Section 80C (say, in PPF or EPF) and ₹50,000 under 80CCD(1B) in NPS.

Under the Old Regime:

  • Total deductions: ₹2.5 lakh (including ₹50,000 standard deduction)
  • Taxable income: ₹15.5 lakh
  • Approximate tax payable: ₹2.88 lakh (after cess)

Under the New Regime:

  • No 80C or NPS deductions, only ₹75,000 standard deduction
  • Taxable income: ₹17.25 lakh
  • Approximate tax payable: ₹1.50 lakh (after cess)

Now, at first glance, it looks like the New Regime saves you ₹1.4 lakh in taxes - and that's true for this year. But here's what most people miss: tax saving is a one-year gain but wealth building is a lifelong habit.

Under the Old Regime, the ₹2 lakh you're setting aside each year for PPF or NPS isn't money lost to deductions; it's your retirement fund growing quietly, tax-free, every single year. Over 20 years, that disciplined saving could build a corpus of over ₹1 crore, assuming a reasonable rate of return.So while the New Regime might win the short-term tax battle, the Old Regime quietly wins the long-term wealth war.

How to Choose the Right Regime for You

There's no one-size-fits-all answer. The right regime depends on your age, income structure, saving habits, and employer benefits. Here's how to think about it:

If you're an early saver: Stick with the Old Regime if you consistently invest in NPS, PPF, or ELSS. The old tax regime comes with higher rates but offers more than 70 exemptions and deductions, including those under Sections 80C, 80D, HRA, and home loan benefits. It's a better fit for people who make regular investments or have significant deductions to claim.

If you're a high-income professional with employer NPS: The New Regime can work well if your employer contributes to NPS under Section 80CCD(2). You'll benefit from lower tax rates and still enjoy tax-free retirement accumulation through employer contributions.

If you're nearing retirement or prefer simplicity: Opting for the New Regime can make sense if your deductions are limited and you value lower immediate taxation and easier compliance. Use the freed-up cash flow to boost your corpus through mutual funds, annuities, or systematic investment plans.

The best way to decide is to compare your tax liability under both regimes and go with the one that gives you a lower tax bill while matching your financial goals.

Before You Decide, Run This Checklist

Every financial year, revisit your tax regime choice thoughtfully. Here's a simple mental checklist:

  • Calculate your total deductions (80C, 80D, 80CCD(1B)) from actual investments
  • Check if your employer contributes under 80CCD(2) that benefit continues under the new regime
  • Compare actual tax payable under both regimes using an updated calculator
  • Factor in future goals the right regime is the one that aligns with your saving behaviour, not just this year's refund amount
  • Review exit taxation on retirement products (NPS, annuities, PPF) to plan post-retirement cash flow efficiently

The PensionBazaar Perspective

At PensionBazaar, we believe the choice of tax regime shouldn't just be a line item on your Form 16 it should be a conscious part of your retirement design. The old regime rewards those who plan early and invest systematically. The new regime benefits those who prefer flexibility and simplified tax filing.

But in both systems, the principle remains the same: your financial independence depends not on the regime you choose, but on how consistently you save, invest, and protect your retirement income from unnecessary taxation.

The smartest plan is to start early, invest regularly, and choose instruments that align with both your financial comfort today and your security tomorrow.

Please share your details

in Years
India
+91

By clicking on "Submit" you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of use

Get Updates on WhatsApp